Client document intake and organization
Route portal uploads, emails, and prior-year files into a client-specific evidence map before a preparer starts sorting.
§7216-sensitive practices
ENTRY CPA-0001Cartulary gives CPA teams a private control layer for client intake, workpaper prep, and CAS responses. Your firm's permissions, review gates, and audit trail sit between staff workflows and every model request.
Route portal uploads, emails, and prior-year files into a client-specific evidence map before a preparer starts sorting.
Draft workpaper notes and tie-out suggestions only after source fields are linked, masked where needed, and queued for reviewer sign-off.
Prepare response drafts from approved client context, then require a human release step before anything leaves the firm.
Start with one packet-heavy workflow: document intake through a reviewed workpaper note. The control layer records who used which source, what was masked, and where reviewer judgment entered.
| Role | Allowed | Gate |
|---|---|---|
| Staff preparer | Classify source docs; view masked fields | Masked |
| Senior reviewer | Approve tie-out notes and source links | Review |
| Partner admin | Set policy, release client responses, reverse drafts | Approved |
Client tax ID · policy CPA-7216-04 · reviewer gate required
| Entry | Timestamp | User | Action | Model | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPA-0042 | 2026-01-14 08:32:10 | staff.prep | Classified 38 client uploads for workpaper prep | model-router | Review |
| CPA-0043 | 2026-01-14 09:05:44 | senior.review | Approved tie-out suggestion after source match | model-router | Approved |
| CPA-0044 | 2026-01-14 09:18:03 | partner.admin | Denied CAS response draft before client delivery | model-router | Denied |
who asked · what data · which model · reviewer decision · when
Cartulary is designed to support CPA teams that need policy control before client data is used in AI workflows. Reviewer sign-off gates stay in the path, and drafts can be reversed before client delivery.
Each workflow ties approved use, denied use, masked fields, and reviewer decisions back to a record your firm can inspect when a client, partner, or regulator asks what happened.
Cartulary is founder-led and built for firms where a partner remains accountable for client work. The product bias is control first: narrow workflows, written policies, reviewer judgment, and a durable record of every AI-assisted action.
Bring one intake, workpaper, or CAS response workflow. Leave with the control points that need to exist before staff use AI on client work.
A practical fallback for firms still setting internal rules: permitted uses, restricted data, review duties, vendor questions, and a partner sign-off page.
Template offer · cpa-firm-ai-use-policy-template · form posts to /api/lead
The working session scopes a narrow workflow and the control requirements before a proposal. The business case should tie to seasonal overtime, rework, partner review time, and risk reduction.
Yes, if the first rollout is narrow. Start with document intake, workpaper tie-outs, or CAS response drafts rather than a firm-wide transformation.
The control layer is designed around firm-owned policy, model routing, masking, and audit logs. Where contractually supported, client data is not retained for vendor training.
No. It gives staff draft structure and source-linked suggestions while keeping reviewer sign-off, partner release, and reversibility in the workflow.