Matter intake and conflicts prep
Turn intake notes, prior-party lists, and firm data into a structured conflicts packet for human review.
Cartulary is the private control layer for firms that want better matter work, matter-level permissions, and a who-saw-what audit trail before client data reaches a model.
Turn intake notes, prior-party lists, and firm data into a structured conflicts packet for human review.
Draft first-pass summaries from permitted matter records while enforcing matter-level permissions.
Generate controlled drafts from approved matter facts, firm templates, and reviewer notes.
The audit log is the demo. A lawyer asks for a first draft, Cartulary checks the matter wall, routes the right context to the selected model, and records every decision before a client-facing document leaves review.
The command center verifies the user, role, matter, source folder, and client restrictions.
Privileged excerpts, client identifiers, and related-party data are masked or withheld according to firm policy.
The summary does not move into the matter file until a reviewer approves, denies, or revises it.
Who asked, what data was used, which model handled the draft, and who approved it stays exportable.
Cartulary is designed to support firm AI policies with matter-level walls, human review gates, and a who-saw-what audit log that can be reviewed before client or outside-counsel questions become urgent.
Cartulary is founder-led. The session starts with one real workflow, one policy concern, and one audit trail your managing partner, firm administrator, and IT lead can evaluate together.
In 20 minutes, map where AI can help, what needs to be blocked, and what has to be logged.
A policy is step one. The template gives partners language for approved uses, restricted data, review duties, outside-counsel provisions, and matter-level controls.
The risk comes from uncontrolled disclosure and weak records. Cartulary is built around matter-level permissions, masking controls, reviewer approval, and an audit log showing what was sent, by whom, and when.
Bar guidance varies, so Cartulary does not replace ethics counsel. It gives the firm controls that are commonly expected in guidance discussions: competence, confidentiality, supervision, human review, and records.
Client restrictions can be represented as matter policy. The command center can block restricted uses, require reviewer approval, and keep a record for later review.
The working session starts by mapping the systems you already use. The goal is a control layer over permitted workflows, not a replacement for your document management or practice management system.